Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
QUEREM VER QUE DE REPENTE O CIGANO PASSOU A VILÃO?
- Blonde girl, 7, removed from Roma family in Ireland
Tipoff leads to removal of seven-year-old girl in Dublin following case in Greece where four-year-old Maria was allegedly abducted
- Henry McDonald in Dublin
- theguardian.com,
- Jump to comments (66)
Irish police have said they have taken a blonde-haired child from a Roma family in Dublin.
The Garda Siochana raided a house in the Tallaght district of west Dublin on Monday afternoon where they found the child. It is understood they searched the house after receiving a tipoff from the public about the presence of the child in the house.
The development in Dublin comes after Monday's court appearance in Greece of a Roma couple who are charged with abducting a four-year-old blonde-haired child.
A garda spokesman said the couple in Tallaght told officers the child was their daughter. However the gardaí were not satisfied with the explanation or with the documents – particularly her birth certificate – that were produced by the family.
The gardaí used powers under the Child Care Act to remove the child from the family.
The girl, who is said to be seven years old, is understood to have been taken into care by the Health Service Executive. The HSE is believed to be seeking a court order to keep the child in care.
She can be kept in the care of the HSE for another month and the authorities must then decide either to hand the girl back to the family or seek a more permanent care order.
In the meantime, gardaí are planning to take DNA samples from the couple and from the girl to establish whether they are related.
Gardaí said on Tuesday afternoon that inquiries to establish the identity of the girl were continuing.
The couple in Greece claimed the girl's biological mother willingly gave her to them as a baby because she could not look after her. DNA tests have shown that the girl is not related to the couple.
The discovery of the girl, known as Maria, has prompted thousands of calls with leads from across the world including several from Ireland as authorities try to track down her real parents.
PARECE QUE OS TESTES DE ADN SÃO REALIZÁVEIS DE A CRIANÇA FOR LOURA.SE AS CRIANÇAS OU FILHOS FOREM PRETOS DE PRETOS TAL NÃO POSSÍVEL...PORRA...
PARECE QUE OS TESTES DE ADN SÃO REALIZÁVEIS DE A CRIANÇA FOR LOURA.SE AS CRIANÇAS OU FILHOS FOREM PRETOS DE PRETOS TAL NÃO POSSÍVEL...PORRA...
Ó PALMA LÁ TENS QUE FAZER MAIS UM ARTIGO.SIM PORQUE CÁ NO SOBADO EM CONSTRUÇÃO AS ESCOLAS NÃO SÃO SEF.SÓ MINISTÉRIO DAS FINANÇAS E DEPOIS DE 6 ANINHOS DOS QUAIS UM PODE SER EM PRISÃO TEMOS MAIS "PORTUGUESES" DE PAPEL PASSADO.E VENDO O QUE ANDA NAS ESCOLAS, NALGUMAS DAS QUAIS O INDIGENATO É MINORIA...
Droit du sol : l'UMP s'invite sur le terrain du FN
LE MONDE | • Mis à jour le |Par Alexandre Lemarié et Abel Mestre
Les ténors de l'UMP profitent de l'"affaire Leonarda" pour s'attaquer à l'un des fondements du pacte républicain : le droit du sol. En réaction à la polémique qui a suivi l'expulsion de l'adolescente, plusieurs responsables du parti ont affirmé leur volonté de restreindre l'accès à la nationalité française, en supprimant le droit du sol pour les enfants de clandestins.
Mardi 22 octobre, le président de l'UMP Jean-François Copé a annoncé à l'AFP que son parti présenterait d'ici à la fin de l'année une proposition de loi prévoyant la fin de l'acquisition automatique de la nationalité pour les enfants nés en France de parents étrangers. Lundi matin, il déclarait déjà sur France inter : "Est-il normal qu'un enfant né en France de parents venus en France irrégulièrement puissedevenir automatiquement français ? Ma réponse est non".
Même s'il reconnaît que ce droit est un "totem", M. Copé assume complètement cette idée. Il l'a formulée pour la première fois, le 2 mai, dans un entretien àValeurs actuelles, jugeant à l'époque nécessaire de "supprimer tout ce qui attire l'immigration clandestine" et de "réduire l'immigration légale".
E AINDA FALTAM OS SEFARDITAS.E AS REFORMAS SEREM ATRIBUÍDAS COM A CERTIDÃO DE ÓBITO...
REPAREM QUE POR CÁ TUDO ISSO É CONSIDERADO PELA CLASSE POLÍTICA TODA UM "ENRIQUECIMENTO", APESAR DA INVASÃO COM SUBSÍDIO IR JÁ PELO MILHÃO...E CÇARO É TUDO MAIS VALIAS...
PS
SÓ ISTO É MOTIVO DE DEFENESTRAÇÃO DE TODA A CLASSE POLÍTICA
CÁ NO SOBADO DE LISBOA O SNS É "UNIVERSAL" MAS A "DÍVIDA" É SÓ PARA O INDIGENATO...
Temporary migrants cost NHS up to £2bn a year, says study
Government-commissioned study suggests figure could be cut by a quarter through measures including charge on new arrivals
The coalition has launched a fresh assault on so-called health tourists by saying short-term immigrants and foreign visitors should pay more than £500m a year towards the cost of their NHS care.
Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, will present a new analysis suggesting temporary migrants are costing the NHS up to £2bn a year, and arguing this could be reduced by a quarter through a charge on new arrivals, better enforcement of the current rules and discouraging people from abusing the system.
The Department of Health commissioned the research after a political row erupted this year over how much health tourism costs the UK. Hunt was heavily criticised for claiming that it cost the taxpayer significantly more than £200m a year, while the NHS had only recorded £33m of charges to foreign nationals, of which £12m was written off.
Hunt will claim that the analysis by Creative Research is vindication of his figures, as MPs prepare to debate the new immigration bill. This will impose a £200 surcharge on temporary migrants coming to Britain for six to 12 months, paid when they arrive, to help cover the cost of their medical care. Creative Research said this would raise about £200m a year.
The report says the cost of immigrants who are already in Britain but not eligible for free treatment is £388m. Hunt is appointing a new NHS director of costs, Sir Keith Pearson, to help the health service get better at charging this group of immigrants for treatment.
The research estimates that the taxpayer will save between £70m and £300m because the government's tougher approach to discouraging health tourists will deter many trying to get free treatment in Britain.
"These independent reports prove this is a serious problem that the government was right to address," said Hunt. "We are confident our new measures will make the NHS fairer and more sustainable for the British families and taxpayers it was set up to serve."
The claims were challenged by Labour, and doctors raised concerns that GPs did not have the capacity to act as border guards monitoring patients' immigration status.
Dr Clare Gerada, chair of the Royal College of GPs, dismissed Hunt's initiative, saying GPs "must not be the Border Agency", adding: "You are more likely to be cared for by an immigrant than encounter a health tourist in the queue."
Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the British Medical Association's GP committee, said there was "limited evidence to suggest that migrants or short-term visitors are consuming large parts of the NHS budget".
"The government's estimates are based on a number of assumptions that result in a figure significantly higher than previous estimates," he said. "GPs and other healthcare professionals do not have the capacity or the resources to administer an extended charging system that could require GPs to extensively vet every single patient when they register with a new practice.
"This would cause inconvenience to all patients and put additional strain on already overstretched GP services that are currently under pressure from rising patient demand and falling resources. It is doubtful that the expensive bureaucracy required to support an extended charging system would recoup enough money to cover the costs of setting it up in the first place."
Nagpaul also warned the government not to deter people from seeking treatment when they needed it. "Not only would this present a risk to the health of that individual, it could also prevent the NHS from identifying individuals with contagious diseases and result in further costs to the NHS should a patient's condition deteriorate to the extent they require more expensive emergency treatment later on," he said.
A Labour source claimed the figures produced by the government were already unravelling.
The report itself contains a note of caution, saying all of its estimates are "subject to varying degrees of uncertainty, relating to the numbers of people and their behaviour".
"The estimates for health tourism, as for any unlawful activity, are impossible to estimate with confidence and are a structured judgment," it says. "The estimates for chargeability are also uncertain because of the complexity of the rules. The estimates are presented as the best that can be made at present, recognising that they are based on incomplete data, sometimes of varying quality, and a large number of assumptions. The analysis is intended to inform policy development around visitor and migrant access to NHS, alongside the DH consultation and work with the NHS."
Andy Burnham, the shadow health secretary, said his party was in favour of charging people with no entitlement to NHS treatment, but the government-backed report appeared to be "more about spin than substance".
"The government's own report undermines their headline-grabbing figures, admitting they are based on old and incomplete data," he said. "Instead of grandstanding, the government need to focus on delivering practical changes. Labour would not support changes that make doctors and nurses surrogate immigration officials."
A spokesman for Hunt said the analysis was based on two separate reports from independent expert market research consultancies – Prederi and Creative Research – which were reviewed by three independent peer reviewers with expertise in modelling and health research.
OS MÉDICOS AGORA IRÃO PAGAR COMO PAGAM TAMBÉM OS PROFESSORES, OS POLÍCIAS, OS MP´S E JUÍZES.SÓ GAJOS DA MAÇONARIA É QUE DEVEM TER UM ESQUEMA PRÓPRIO...
OS MÉDICOS AGORA IRÃO PAGAR COMO PAGAM TAMBÉM OS PROFESSORES, OS POLÍCIAS, OS MP´S E JUÍZES.SÓ GAJOS DA MAÇONARIA É QUE DEVEM TER UM ESQUEMA PRÓPRIO...
TAMBÉM POR CÁ NO SOBADO DE LISBOA TIVEMOS UM GRANDE BOLIVARIANO:O SÓCRATES...
Fortuna de Chávez, miseria de Venezuela
Es difícil explicar cómo el país ha podido dilapidar una fortuna más de 15 veces mayor a la requerida para la reconstrucción de Europa después de la Segunda Guerra
Archivado en:
La gran fortuna de Hugo Chávez fue que le tocó gobernar en una era en la cual el barril de petroleo ha estado rondando -hacia arriba o abajo- los 100 dólares. Su popularidad soportó exitosamente los embates del tiempo no debido a su carisma, o a sus dotes oratorias, sino gracias a que disponía con absoluta discreción de una cantidad ingente de dinero público, que gastaba como, donde y cuando le daba la gana. Y en ello, fue único, hay que decirlo: el club de los petro-dictadores tiene pocos miembros, y ninguno tan derrochador como lo era Chávez, durante cuyo mandato los ingresos de Venezuela fueron más cuantiosos que aquellos recibidos en los 40 años que le precedieron, según cifras del Banco Mundial.
El malgasto del dinero público en Venezuela sera objeto de estudio por muchos años, por cuanto es difícil explicar cómo un país de menos de 30 millones de habitantes ha podido dilapidar una fortuna más de 15 veces mayor a la requerida para la reconstrucción de Europa después de la Segunda Guerra, y encontrarse en la miserable depauperación en la que está Venezuela.
Citaré dos ejemplos, uno de negligencia y otro de derroche injustificado. Según estadísticas de la Cámara Venezolana de la Construcción, y de la Cámara Inmobiliaria de Venezuela, entre 1969 y 1998 se construyeron 2.033.481 viviendas:
- 655.699 entre 1969 y 1978
- 759.632 entre 1979 y 1988
- 618.150 entre 1989 y 1998
¿Cuántas viviendas construyó el régimen de Chávez entre 1999 y 2010?
- 296.047 unidades habitables
Dicho de otro modo, el chavismo construyó (hasta 2010) un 14% de las viviendas construidas en décadas anteriores, por gobiernos que contaban con presupuestos ínfimos en comparación. Cabe afirmar: el producto interno bruto combinado de los gobiernos de la democracia, pre arribo del caudillo al poder, fue de 1,6 billones de dólares aproximadamente; el producto interno bruto del régimen de Chavez hasta el 2011 había sido 1,8 billones de dólares aproximadamente, y eso sin contar deuda interna y externa adquirida. El gráfico adjunto ayuda a poner de relieve el inobjetable fracaso en ese aspecto.
Las cifras demuestran que el chavismo ha fracasado rotundamente en utilizar los ingresos percibidos para cubrir el déficit de viviendas que hay en el país. Entonces, en qué se ha gastado el dinero? Pasemos al ejemplo de derroche injustificado, que ningún beneficio aporta a la población: el gasto en armamento.
Según cifras del Instituto Internacional de Estudios para la Paz de Estocolmo (SIPRI por sus siglas en inglés) entre 1999 y 2013, el chavismo adquirió armas por un valor de 80.158 millones de Bolívares (12.000 millones de dólares), mientras que cifras de la misma fuente indican que el gasto hasta 1999 había sido de 2.444 millones de Bolívares. El único lugar donde Venezuela se encontraba en estado de guerra -lo cual explicaría tal absurdo malgasto- era en la mente obnubilada de Chávez. Las reservas internacionales de Venezuela en el periodo 1999-2013 se han mantenido -salvo picos excepcionales- entre 15.000 y 30.000 millones de dólares. Aun así, el chavismo no ha puesto reparo en destinar dicho monto en adquisición de material bélico, convirtiendo a Venezuela, quizás único país en la región que no ha sufrido ningún tipo de conflicto armado interno o externo en más de un siglo, en el mayor comprador e importador de armas en la región. ¿Para qué tal despilfarro? ¿Cuántas casas para familias de escasos recursos se habrían podido construir con esos 80.158 millones de Bolívares?
Etiquetas:
ATÉ DA VENEZUELA IMPORTANMOS PANELEIROS...
VÃO PERGUNTAR AO COSTA DE LISBOA, AO BOAVENTURA DAS MIGRAÇÕES QUE ELES ENCHEM ISTO DE PRETOS AINDA MAIS DEPRESSA.SEGUNDO "ESTUDOS" ISSO FAZ AUMENTAR O PIB...
Clique na imagem para ver as simulações de IRS e pensões
Houve o ‘além-troika’ em 2012, o “enorme aumento de impostos” em 2013 e a reforma do Estado em 2014. Além da marca própria de cada um, os três orçamentos do Estado (OE) anuais feitos durante a intervenção da troika vão incluir um total de 20 mil milhões de euros em medidas de austeridade, o equivalente a 12% do PIB.Mas, apesar da dimensão deste pacote de cortes na despesa e aumento de receitas, o défice orçamental do Estado neste período só será reduzido em 2,8 pontos percentuais: de 7,2% do PIB no início de 2012 para 4% estimados para o final de 2014.
PÁ MAS COMO SÃO QUASE TODOS SUBSIDIADOS O PIB AUMENTA E A "DÍVIDA" TAMBÉM PORQUE O ESTADO SOCIAL É INTERNACIONALISTA DE ACORDO COM A CONSTITUIÇÃO...
COMO JÁ DEVEM TER REPARADO OS "CORTES" NOS DE "CIMA" TÊM SIDO TODOS COMIDOS PELAS SOPAS DOS POBRES E AFINS...CONTINUANDO A HAVER "DÉFICES" POR TODO O LADO.CULPA CLARO DOS PENSIONISTAS E REFORMADOS, OS MALANDROS...
OS VOSSOS QUERIDOS ELEITOS CONTROLADOS PELA MAÇONARIA SÓ NOS 2 ÚLTIMOS ANOS "NACIONALIZARAM" 180000 POBREZINHOS.DEPOIS DA ENTREGA DE TUDO O QUE TINHA PRETO E NÃO ERA NOSSO...ONDE CLARO NÃO SE PODIA IR FAZER O HOMEM NOVO E MULATO...
ARRANJARAM-VOS UMA BELA ALBARDA, MAS COM MUITA LIBERDADE DEMOCRACIA.MAS CALMA QUE AINDA ESTÃO PARA VIR OS JUDEUS SEFARDITAS.AÍ VÃO FICAR NO PARAÍSO...
PÁ MAS COMO SÃO QUASE TODOS SUBSIDIADOS O PIB AUMENTA E A "DÍVIDA" TAMBÉM PORQUE O ESTADO SOCIAL É INTERNACIONALISTA DE ACORDO COM A CONSTITUIÇÃO...
COMO JÁ DEVEM TER REPARADO OS "CORTES" NOS DE "CIMA" TÊM SIDO TODOS COMIDOS PELAS SOPAS DOS POBRES E AFINS...CONTINUANDO A HAVER "DÉFICES" POR TODO O LADO.CULPA CLARO DOS PENSIONISTAS E REFORMADOS, OS MALANDROS...
OS VOSSOS QUERIDOS ELEITOS CONTROLADOS PELA MAÇONARIA SÓ NOS 2 ÚLTIMOS ANOS "NACIONALIZARAM" 180000 POBREZINHOS.DEPOIS DA ENTREGA DE TUDO O QUE TINHA PRETO E NÃO ERA NOSSO...ONDE CLARO NÃO SE PODIA IR FAZER O HOMEM NOVO E MULATO...
ARRANJARAM-VOS UMA BELA ALBARDA, MAS COM MUITA LIBERDADE DEMOCRACIA.MAS CALMA QUE AINDA ESTÃO PARA VIR OS JUDEUS SEFARDITAS.AÍ VÃO FICAR NO PARAÍSO...
Monday, October 21, 2013
OS REFORMADOS DA CGA TÊM UM ALIADO DE PESO.O TEDH.PARA ELES RETROACTIVIDADE NÃO PASSARÁ...
NÃO PASSOU PARA ASSASSINOS E DEIXAVAM PASSAR PARA PACÍFICOS REFORMADOS?
JOAQUIM APROVEITA UMA OPORTUNIDADE DE TERES A TURMA TODA E FAZ UM DISCURSO APELANDO AOS JUÍZES DE BERLIM
JOAQUIM APROVEITA UMA OPORTUNIDADE DE TERES A TURMA TODA E FAZ UM DISCURSO APELANDO AOS JUÍZES DE BERLIM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)