120 mil portugueses afectados por proposta de Cameron
120 mil portugueses afectados por proposta de Cameron
Ideia de cortar apoios sociais aos imigrantes da UE também atinge portugueses.
E JÁ SABEM ISSO DE "PORTUGUESES" AGORA SÓ COM FOTOGRAFIA...
PERTENCE CERTAMENTE AO submundo da blogosfera DE ACORDO COM CIENTÍFICAS CLASSIFICAÇÕES DUNS GAJOS QUE VIVEM DOS MEUS IMPOSTOS E ANDAM A AFUNDAR PORTUGAL
Wednesday, January 6, 2016
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
QUE AS ESGANIÇADAS DO PÚBLICO E DO BLOCO DE ESQUERDA ABENÇOEM ESTA DISTRIBUIÇÃO DE LEITE E QUIÇÁ DE BONS GENES...
A Cologne, l’agression de dizaines de femmes au Nouvel An suscite l’indignation
Le Monde.fr | 05.01.2016 à 18h20 • Mis à jour le 05.01.2016 à 19h07 |
Par Cécile Boutelet (Berlin, correspondance)
Abonnez vous à partir de 1 € Réagir ClasserPartager (2 636)Tweeter
La maire de Cologne, Henriette Reker, et Wolfgang Albers, le chef de la police locale, lors d'une conférence de presse le 5 janvier.
C’est un événement qui devrait peser lourd dans le débat actuel sur l’accueil des réfugiés en Allemagne. A Cologne, en Rhénanie-du-Nord-Westphalie, la nuit de la Saint-Sylvestre s’est transformée en cauchemar pour des dizaines de femmes, agressées aux abords de la gare centrale.
Cinq jours après les faits, les plaintes se multiplient : 90 femmes ont déclaré à la police avoir été agressées, dont certaines sexuellement, par plusieurs centaines d’hommes « essentiellement d’origine arabe et nord-africaine », a déclaré le chef de la police locale, Wolfgang Albers. Les événements, inédits en Allemagne, ont provoqué la tenue d’une réunion de crise mardi 5 janvier à Cologne.
Lors d’une conversation téléphonique avec la maire de la ville, Angela Merkel a exprimé « son indignation contre ces répugnantes attaques et agressions sexuelles, qui appellent une réponse révère de l’Etat de droit ».
« Il faut tout mettre en œuvre pour que les responsables soient identifiés dans leur intégralité aussi vite que possible, et qu’ils soient condamnés, sans considération de leur origine ou de leur passé ».
A Hambourg et à Stuttgart, des agressions similaires se sont produites le même soir, sans atteindre l’ampleur qu’elles ont eue à Cologne.
Un tiers des plaintes rapportent des agressions d’ordre sexuel
Selon les informations des forces de l’ordre, des centaines d’hommes, jusqu’à un millier d’individus selon la police, s’étaient rassemblés place de la gare à Cologne vers minuit. Sous l’emprise de l’alcool, ils s’en sont pris à des femmes qu’ils ont agressées, soit sexuellement, soit pour leur voler leur portable ou leur sac à main.
Environ un tiers des quelque 90 plaintes déposées jusqu'à mardi midi rapportent des agressions d’ordre sexuel. Le nombre de victimes réelles pourrait être beaucoup plus élevé, estime la police. « C’est une nouvelle dimension de la violence. Nous n’avons jamais vu cela », a déclaré Arnold Plickert, président du syndicat de la police en Rhénanie-du-Nord-Westphalie. L’enquête est en cours pour identifier les auteurs des agressions. La police n’a pour l’instant procédé à aucune interpellation.
A Cologne, les événements ont provoqué une forte émotion. Une réunion de crise s’est tenue mardi après-midi dans la perspective du Carnaval, qui doit rassembler à la fin du mois un million de personnes dans la ville, une manifestation habituellement très pacifique. « La police et la justice prendront toutes les mesures nécessaires contre cette nouvelle dimension de la violence et des agressions sexuelles par des groupes d’hommes », a déclaré la ministre-présidente du Land de Rhénanie-du-Nord-Westphalie, Hannelore Kraft.
Ralf Jäger, ministre de la justice régional, a annoncé qu’un nouveau plan de déploiement des forces de l’ordre serait adopté pour la semaine du carnaval et un renforcement de la sécurité. « Nous le devons à la fois aux femmes et aux réfugiés nord-africains, qui veulent vivre en paix chez nous », a souligné le ministre. « Il est important que ce genre d’incident ne remette pas en cause les festivités du carnaval », a déclaré la maire de Cologne, Henriette Reker. Celle-ci avait été agressée par un activiste allemand d’extrême droite opposé à l’accueil des réfugiés, charge qu’elle supervisait à Cologne jusqu’à son élection comme maire de la ville en octobre.
L’extrême droite tente de s’emparer de l’affaire
A Berlin, les responsables politiques ont multiplié les réactions, mardi, tant le sujet peut être explosif dans le contexte actuel. Le parti d’extrême droite NPD et le parti populiste de droite AfD se sont saisi de l’affaire pour attaquer les partis traditionnels sur la question des réfugiés.
Le site Spiegel Online a fermé les forums sous ses articles sur le sujet devant le grand nombre de commentaires insultants déposés par les internautes.
Heiko Maas, ministre de la justice, a promis la fermeté contre les auteurs des agressions. Le ministre de l’intérieur, Thomas de Maizière, a jugé les attaques contre les femmes « odieuses et inacceptables ». Il a ajouté que « l’apparente participation de personnes issues de l’immigration » ne devait pas « conduire à ce que les réfugiés, quelle que soit leur origine, venus chercher chez nous la protection contre les persécutions, fassent l’objet d’une suspicion générale », a déclaré M. de Maizière.
L’Allemagne est habituellement considérée comme un pays particulièrement sûr pour les femmes. Les enquêtes d’opinion montrent que de nombreux Allemands s’inquiètent des conséquences de l’accueil de milliers de réfugiés dans leur pays, notamment sur le sujet sensible des rapports entre les hommes et les femmes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Internacional
Polícia procura 1000 homens por assédio sexual em massa
Polícia procura 1000 homens por assédio sexual em massa
A polícia alemã procura 1000 homens por terem assediado sexualmente dezenas de mulheres na noite de passagem de ano, em Colónia, lê-se no site da NBC.
A PANELEIRAGEM NÃO DÁ CONTA DE TANTO CARALHO PORTANTO OS ACOLHIDOS SÓ PODEM ENCHER DE LEITE AS CONAS DAS INDÍGENAS.E SEM PIROPO...
PS
A SHARIA SEGUE DENTRO DE MOMENTOS...
Le Monde.fr | 05.01.2016 à 18h20 • Mis à jour le 05.01.2016 à 19h07 |
Par Cécile Boutelet (Berlin, correspondance)
Abonnez vous à partir de 1 € Réagir ClasserPartager (2 636)Tweeter
La maire de Cologne, Henriette Reker, et Wolfgang Albers, le chef de la police locale, lors d'une conférence de presse le 5 janvier.
C’est un événement qui devrait peser lourd dans le débat actuel sur l’accueil des réfugiés en Allemagne. A Cologne, en Rhénanie-du-Nord-Westphalie, la nuit de la Saint-Sylvestre s’est transformée en cauchemar pour des dizaines de femmes, agressées aux abords de la gare centrale.
Cinq jours après les faits, les plaintes se multiplient : 90 femmes ont déclaré à la police avoir été agressées, dont certaines sexuellement, par plusieurs centaines d’hommes « essentiellement d’origine arabe et nord-africaine », a déclaré le chef de la police locale, Wolfgang Albers. Les événements, inédits en Allemagne, ont provoqué la tenue d’une réunion de crise mardi 5 janvier à Cologne.
Lors d’une conversation téléphonique avec la maire de la ville, Angela Merkel a exprimé « son indignation contre ces répugnantes attaques et agressions sexuelles, qui appellent une réponse révère de l’Etat de droit ».
« Il faut tout mettre en œuvre pour que les responsables soient identifiés dans leur intégralité aussi vite que possible, et qu’ils soient condamnés, sans considération de leur origine ou de leur passé ».
A Hambourg et à Stuttgart, des agressions similaires se sont produites le même soir, sans atteindre l’ampleur qu’elles ont eue à Cologne.
Un tiers des plaintes rapportent des agressions d’ordre sexuel
Selon les informations des forces de l’ordre, des centaines d’hommes, jusqu’à un millier d’individus selon la police, s’étaient rassemblés place de la gare à Cologne vers minuit. Sous l’emprise de l’alcool, ils s’en sont pris à des femmes qu’ils ont agressées, soit sexuellement, soit pour leur voler leur portable ou leur sac à main.
Environ un tiers des quelque 90 plaintes déposées jusqu'à mardi midi rapportent des agressions d’ordre sexuel. Le nombre de victimes réelles pourrait être beaucoup plus élevé, estime la police. « C’est une nouvelle dimension de la violence. Nous n’avons jamais vu cela », a déclaré Arnold Plickert, président du syndicat de la police en Rhénanie-du-Nord-Westphalie. L’enquête est en cours pour identifier les auteurs des agressions. La police n’a pour l’instant procédé à aucune interpellation.
A Cologne, les événements ont provoqué une forte émotion. Une réunion de crise s’est tenue mardi après-midi dans la perspective du Carnaval, qui doit rassembler à la fin du mois un million de personnes dans la ville, une manifestation habituellement très pacifique. « La police et la justice prendront toutes les mesures nécessaires contre cette nouvelle dimension de la violence et des agressions sexuelles par des groupes d’hommes », a déclaré la ministre-présidente du Land de Rhénanie-du-Nord-Westphalie, Hannelore Kraft.
Ralf Jäger, ministre de la justice régional, a annoncé qu’un nouveau plan de déploiement des forces de l’ordre serait adopté pour la semaine du carnaval et un renforcement de la sécurité. « Nous le devons à la fois aux femmes et aux réfugiés nord-africains, qui veulent vivre en paix chez nous », a souligné le ministre. « Il est important que ce genre d’incident ne remette pas en cause les festivités du carnaval », a déclaré la maire de Cologne, Henriette Reker. Celle-ci avait été agressée par un activiste allemand d’extrême droite opposé à l’accueil des réfugiés, charge qu’elle supervisait à Cologne jusqu’à son élection comme maire de la ville en octobre.
L’extrême droite tente de s’emparer de l’affaire
A Berlin, les responsables politiques ont multiplié les réactions, mardi, tant le sujet peut être explosif dans le contexte actuel. Le parti d’extrême droite NPD et le parti populiste de droite AfD se sont saisi de l’affaire pour attaquer les partis traditionnels sur la question des réfugiés.
Le site Spiegel Online a fermé les forums sous ses articles sur le sujet devant le grand nombre de commentaires insultants déposés par les internautes.
Heiko Maas, ministre de la justice, a promis la fermeté contre les auteurs des agressions. Le ministre de l’intérieur, Thomas de Maizière, a jugé les attaques contre les femmes « odieuses et inacceptables ». Il a ajouté que « l’apparente participation de personnes issues de l’immigration » ne devait pas « conduire à ce que les réfugiés, quelle que soit leur origine, venus chercher chez nous la protection contre les persécutions, fassent l’objet d’une suspicion générale », a déclaré M. de Maizière.
L’Allemagne est habituellement considérée comme un pays particulièrement sûr pour les femmes. Les enquêtes d’opinion montrent que de nombreux Allemands s’inquiètent des conséquences de l’accueil de milliers de réfugiés dans leur pays, notamment sur le sujet sensible des rapports entre les hommes et les femmes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Internacional
Polícia procura 1000 homens por assédio sexual em massa
Polícia procura 1000 homens por assédio sexual em massa
A polícia alemã procura 1000 homens por terem assediado sexualmente dezenas de mulheres na noite de passagem de ano, em Colónia, lê-se no site da NBC.
A PANELEIRAGEM NÃO DÁ CONTA DE TANTO CARALHO PORTANTO OS ACOLHIDOS SÓ PODEM ENCHER DE LEITE AS CONAS DAS INDÍGENAS.E SEM PIROPO...
PS
A SHARIA SEGUE DENTRO DE MOMENTOS...
IMAGINEM QUEM UM DIA VAI PAGAR O ACTUAL SALVAMENTO DO PLANETA...SERÁ O MEXILHÃO INTERNACIONALISTA?
Crise da dívida
na Grécia está planejando cortes duras para pensionistas
Grécia pensionistas ameaçar novas medidas de austeridade pesados. O governo quer cortar-lhes a pensão por tanto como 30 por cento.
OLHEM QUE JÁ O CUNHAL DIZIA QUE HÁ QUE IR A ONDE O HÁ...E SÃO SÓ 30% DOS CONTRIBUINTES ALGUNS DOS QUAIS RESPONSÁVEIS PELO DESCALABRO PORQUE RECEBEM POR FORA...
na Grécia está planejando cortes duras para pensionistas
Grécia pensionistas ameaçar novas medidas de austeridade pesados. O governo quer cortar-lhes a pensão por tanto como 30 por cento.
OLHEM QUE JÁ O CUNHAL DIZIA QUE HÁ QUE IR A ONDE O HÁ...E SÃO SÓ 30% DOS CONTRIBUINTES ALGUNS DOS QUAIS RESPONSÁVEIS PELO DESCALABRO PORQUE RECEBEM POR FORA...
ANDA POR AÍ UMA FÚRIA COM JARDINS QUE NÃO VOS DIGO MAIS NADA
Seguir na 2.ª Circular a 60 km/hora pelo meio de árvores
NUM TEMPO DE VACAS MAGRAS DEPOIS DE ANOS DE FESTAS COM OBRAS PARA DAR EMPREGOS AOS CABO-VERDIANOS E AFINS LISBOA RESISTE.JÁ VI GRANDES RENOVAÇÕES EM QUE NO JARDIM QUASE NÃO SE NOTOU A DIFERENÇA...
NUM TEMPO DE VACAS MAGRAS DEPOIS DE ANOS DE FESTAS COM OBRAS PARA DAR EMPREGOS AOS CABO-VERDIANOS E AFINS LISBOA RESISTE.JÁ VI GRANDES RENOVAÇÕES EM QUE NO JARDIM QUASE NÃO SE NOTOU A DIFERENÇA...
Monday, January 4, 2016
EUROPE FOR GENUINE EUROPEANS ONLY PLEASE...
Europe must get together and close its borders to all returning jihadis
Sweden’s decision to end its open frontier with Denmark is necessary for it to be able to defend itself
By Philip Johnston6:16PM GMT 04 Jan 2016 Comments149 Comments
You don’t need to have driven over the five-mile Oresund crossing between Denmark and Sweden to understand its importance. Any fan of the Nordic noir TV crime series The Bridge will be aware of how it facilitates borderless movement between the two countries to such an extent that they are virtually indistinguishable. Police officers dash back and forth between Copenhagen and Malmo into each other’s jurisdictions without a by-your-leave. So, too, do the criminals.
Sweden’s decision, therefore, to impose ID checks on travellers from Denmark is quite a moment. All train, bus and ferry passengers are now required to show photo identification before being allowed across a border that has not existed in any real sense for many years. The Scandinavians have been operating their own mini-Schengen area since the 1950s. The migration crisis, and Sweden’s propensity to take in more refugees per head of population than any other EU country, has put an end to that.
"Anyone who has gone to live in this self-styled caliphate should forfeit their nationality since they are so keen to adopt a new one"
However, this is not just about being able to control migration; it is also to do with security. How are countries to defend themselves against those determined to do them harm if they cannot identify who wants to enter and then decide whether or not to let them in? And that must include their own citizens, who pose the greatest threat of all.
The emergence of another Jihadi John character to taunt his homeland with promises of violence and carnage will reopen the debate about how to deal with those nationals whose loyalty now is to their self-styled caliphate.
The masked jihadi, speaking in a London accent, mocks David Cameron as “an imbecile” for ordering the RAF to target Islamic State (Isil) in Syria. He added: “All British government. All people of Britain, know that today your citizenship is under our feet and that the Islamic State, our country, is here to stay and we will continue to wage jihad, break borders and one day invade your land, when you will be ruled by Sharia.”
Leave aside the braggadocio and bluster about the ability of such a motley army to stage an invasion; but his threat to “break borders” is all too real. Thousands of foreign nationals have gone to fight with Isil in Syria and Iraq and many have returned to their home countries. The perpetrators of the Paris massacre were Belgians and French jihadis who had travelled in and out of Europe with ease, not least because there are (or were) no internal borders. Even though these people claim allegiance to their caliphate they use their citizenship to re-enter and conspire against the country they have disavowed. Why do we let them?
Anyone who has gone to live in this self-styled caliphate should forfeit their nationality since they are so keen to adopt a new one. It should be advertised loud and clear in all Muslim communities that if radicalised young Islamists go to Syria they cannot come back. They might try to, and might even succeed if their identity is never discovered; but most will be known to the police or the intelligence services and their names placed on a watch-list. It is hard to understand the arguments against banishing these people. They laugh at the international laws that prevent statelessness and scorn the half-cocked measures we are forced to introduce as a result, such as terrorist “asbos” and temporary exclusions orders.
There is an argument that returning jihadis can be deployed to dissuade other would-be fighters joining Isil in the first place. But finding former fanatics prepared to be branded apostates by their peers is not easy. The Government has an anti-radicalisation programme called Channel to which hundreds of suspected radicals have been referred to try to stop them falling into Isil’s clutches. Yet the scheme has been criticised for stigmatising all Muslims and it is not clear how successful it is at intercepting returning jihadis.
Around 700 British Muslims have travelled to Syria . Fifty or so have been killed while about 350 are thought to have been allowed back into the country and a few dozen have been convicted of offences for supporting terrorism abroad or are being investigated. But most have not been charged even though adherence to Isil is supposedly a crime.
Why is this? Has a decision been taken that most returning jihadis are harmless, made a mistake and will live blameless lives in future? Perhaps they will; but it is a big gamble for any country to take. It would be better not to let them back in the first place. That, of course, means being able to identify who they are and to intercept them if they try to return. Yet it is highly doubtful that our border controls are up to the task. A report yesterday from the Centre for Policy Studies disclosed that some 67,500 ships and planes are not met by overworked border staff while targets for detection and seizures are routinely missed. The National Audit Office reported recently that border points are routinely understaffed and that the troubled e-borders programme is only now showing signs of working after 12 years and £830 million spent on it.
We have also long had the equivalent of the Scandinavian no-border arrangement in the common travel area with Ireland.
There is growing concern that radicalised British Muslims returning from Iraq and Syria are flying into Dublin and Shannon and sneaking back into the UK by way of Northern Ireland. Although crossing points were often manned by the police or Army during the Troubles, passport controls have never been imposed in peacetime since partition. No one wants frontiers put up between Ireland and the UK; but nor did they want them reinstated between Denmark and Sweden.
"Psychopaths like Jihadi John and his balaclava-wearing successor claim allegiance to a state. Let them stay there"
Many of the assumptions about the movement of people that have been taken as gospel for decades will now have to be revisited. That includes the international barrier against rendering people stateless. Since this is not just a matter for the UK but for all countries whose nationals pose a threat to their security it should be possible to reach an accord to change or at least suspend treaties to recognise the new, dangerous reality. To argue otherwise is to risk a repeat of the carnage seen in Paris.
Why on earth should we not defend ourselves? After all, psychopaths like Jihadi John and his balaclava-wearing successor claim allegiance to a state. Let them stay there; we don’t want them back.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/12081296/Europe-must-get-together-and-close-its-borders-to-all-returning-jihadis.html
JIHADIS AND CRIMINALS OUT OF EUROPE
Sweden’s decision to end its open frontier with Denmark is necessary for it to be able to defend itself
By Philip Johnston6:16PM GMT 04 Jan 2016 Comments149 Comments
You don’t need to have driven over the five-mile Oresund crossing between Denmark and Sweden to understand its importance. Any fan of the Nordic noir TV crime series The Bridge will be aware of how it facilitates borderless movement between the two countries to such an extent that they are virtually indistinguishable. Police officers dash back and forth between Copenhagen and Malmo into each other’s jurisdictions without a by-your-leave. So, too, do the criminals.
Sweden’s decision, therefore, to impose ID checks on travellers from Denmark is quite a moment. All train, bus and ferry passengers are now required to show photo identification before being allowed across a border that has not existed in any real sense for many years. The Scandinavians have been operating their own mini-Schengen area since the 1950s. The migration crisis, and Sweden’s propensity to take in more refugees per head of population than any other EU country, has put an end to that.
"Anyone who has gone to live in this self-styled caliphate should forfeit their nationality since they are so keen to adopt a new one"
However, this is not just about being able to control migration; it is also to do with security. How are countries to defend themselves against those determined to do them harm if they cannot identify who wants to enter and then decide whether or not to let them in? And that must include their own citizens, who pose the greatest threat of all.
The emergence of another Jihadi John character to taunt his homeland with promises of violence and carnage will reopen the debate about how to deal with those nationals whose loyalty now is to their self-styled caliphate.
The masked jihadi, speaking in a London accent, mocks David Cameron as “an imbecile” for ordering the RAF to target Islamic State (Isil) in Syria. He added: “All British government. All people of Britain, know that today your citizenship is under our feet and that the Islamic State, our country, is here to stay and we will continue to wage jihad, break borders and one day invade your land, when you will be ruled by Sharia.”
Leave aside the braggadocio and bluster about the ability of such a motley army to stage an invasion; but his threat to “break borders” is all too real. Thousands of foreign nationals have gone to fight with Isil in Syria and Iraq and many have returned to their home countries. The perpetrators of the Paris massacre were Belgians and French jihadis who had travelled in and out of Europe with ease, not least because there are (or were) no internal borders. Even though these people claim allegiance to their caliphate they use their citizenship to re-enter and conspire against the country they have disavowed. Why do we let them?
Anyone who has gone to live in this self-styled caliphate should forfeit their nationality since they are so keen to adopt a new one. It should be advertised loud and clear in all Muslim communities that if radicalised young Islamists go to Syria they cannot come back. They might try to, and might even succeed if their identity is never discovered; but most will be known to the police or the intelligence services and their names placed on a watch-list. It is hard to understand the arguments against banishing these people. They laugh at the international laws that prevent statelessness and scorn the half-cocked measures we are forced to introduce as a result, such as terrorist “asbos” and temporary exclusions orders.
There is an argument that returning jihadis can be deployed to dissuade other would-be fighters joining Isil in the first place. But finding former fanatics prepared to be branded apostates by their peers is not easy. The Government has an anti-radicalisation programme called Channel to which hundreds of suspected radicals have been referred to try to stop them falling into Isil’s clutches. Yet the scheme has been criticised for stigmatising all Muslims and it is not clear how successful it is at intercepting returning jihadis.
Around 700 British Muslims have travelled to Syria . Fifty or so have been killed while about 350 are thought to have been allowed back into the country and a few dozen have been convicted of offences for supporting terrorism abroad or are being investigated. But most have not been charged even though adherence to Isil is supposedly a crime.
Why is this? Has a decision been taken that most returning jihadis are harmless, made a mistake and will live blameless lives in future? Perhaps they will; but it is a big gamble for any country to take. It would be better not to let them back in the first place. That, of course, means being able to identify who they are and to intercept them if they try to return. Yet it is highly doubtful that our border controls are up to the task. A report yesterday from the Centre for Policy Studies disclosed that some 67,500 ships and planes are not met by overworked border staff while targets for detection and seizures are routinely missed. The National Audit Office reported recently that border points are routinely understaffed and that the troubled e-borders programme is only now showing signs of working after 12 years and £830 million spent on it.
We have also long had the equivalent of the Scandinavian no-border arrangement in the common travel area with Ireland.
There is growing concern that radicalised British Muslims returning from Iraq and Syria are flying into Dublin and Shannon and sneaking back into the UK by way of Northern Ireland. Although crossing points were often manned by the police or Army during the Troubles, passport controls have never been imposed in peacetime since partition. No one wants frontiers put up between Ireland and the UK; but nor did they want them reinstated between Denmark and Sweden.
"Psychopaths like Jihadi John and his balaclava-wearing successor claim allegiance to a state. Let them stay there"
Many of the assumptions about the movement of people that have been taken as gospel for decades will now have to be revisited. That includes the international barrier against rendering people stateless. Since this is not just a matter for the UK but for all countries whose nationals pose a threat to their security it should be possible to reach an accord to change or at least suspend treaties to recognise the new, dangerous reality. To argue otherwise is to risk a repeat of the carnage seen in Paris.
Why on earth should we not defend ourselves? After all, psychopaths like Jihadi John and his balaclava-wearing successor claim allegiance to a state. Let them stay there; we don’t want them back.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/12081296/Europe-must-get-together-and-close-its-borders-to-all-returning-jihadis.html
JIHADIS AND CRIMINALS OUT OF EUROPE
Ó MARCELO ELES SEMPRE PODEM COPIAR O AMILCAR CABRAL.EXIGIR A INDEPENDÊNCIA...
A alguns quilómetros de distância, em Oeiras, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa aproveitou a visita ao Bairro do Pombal – onde a maioria da população é de origem cabo-verdiana – para lamentar que os imigrantes residentes em Portugal quase não tenham representação política. "Não há praticamente nenhuma figura saída da comunidade imigrante que esteja no Parlamento, no Governo, no patronato, nos sindicatos, no poder local, é um país clandestino", afirmou o ex-líder do PSD, que quis evitar questões sobre o apoio de Passos Coelho à sua candidatura. Desta vez, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa não levou a marmita, mas aproveitou por provar uma cachupa e beber grogue, típicos de Cabo Verde.
~~~~
Numa visita ao Centro de Acolhimento para Crianças Refugiadas, em Lisboa, Sampaio da Nóvoa foi abordado por um jovem que lhe perguntou o que fará em relação ao tema se for eleito Chefe de Estado. O ex-reitor prometeu " grande abertura". No final, aos jornalistas, admitiu que o drama dos refugiados "é uma situação que nos preocupa a todos"
A COMER DE DOIS CARRINHOS NÃO?LISTEM LÁ BEM OS "BACK OFFICE" ONDE A MALTA ANDA EMBOSCADA...
O MARCELO QUERIA QUE OS POBRES CHEGASSEM E PRONTOS MANDEM LÁ...
OUVIR DIZER QUE SEM EMPREGO DEVERIAM IR EMBORA É QUE NUNCA NUNCA NUNCA...QUE O ESTADO SOCIAL INTERNACIONALISTA ESTÁ CHEIO DE DINHEIRO...
PS
ISTO É QUE É O FARDO DO HOMEM BRANCO...SE ESTÁ EM África está a mais e é racista.Se está cá na sua santa terrinha tem que "acolher" quem quiser vir e ainda por cima pagar...
PS1
SE NÃO TIRAR URGENTEMENTE UM CURSO DE SOCIOLOGIA OU UMA BAJUDA BOA SE NÃO SE OFERECER AO CASTIGO PORRA O QUE SERÁ DISTO.ESTE AVANTE DA REACÇÃO...
~~~~
Numa visita ao Centro de Acolhimento para Crianças Refugiadas, em Lisboa, Sampaio da Nóvoa foi abordado por um jovem que lhe perguntou o que fará em relação ao tema se for eleito Chefe de Estado. O ex-reitor prometeu " grande abertura". No final, aos jornalistas, admitiu que o drama dos refugiados "é uma situação que nos preocupa a todos"
A COMER DE DOIS CARRINHOS NÃO?LISTEM LÁ BEM OS "BACK OFFICE" ONDE A MALTA ANDA EMBOSCADA...
O MARCELO QUERIA QUE OS POBRES CHEGASSEM E PRONTOS MANDEM LÁ...
OUVIR DIZER QUE SEM EMPREGO DEVERIAM IR EMBORA É QUE NUNCA NUNCA NUNCA...QUE O ESTADO SOCIAL INTERNACIONALISTA ESTÁ CHEIO DE DINHEIRO...
PS
ISTO É QUE É O FARDO DO HOMEM BRANCO...SE ESTÁ EM África está a mais e é racista.Se está cá na sua santa terrinha tem que "acolher" quem quiser vir e ainda por cima pagar...
PS1
SE NÃO TIRAR URGENTEMENTE UM CURSO DE SOCIOLOGIA OU UMA BAJUDA BOA SE NÃO SE OFERECER AO CASTIGO PORRA O QUE SERÁ DISTO.ESTE AVANTE DA REACÇÃO...
TEMOS UM ESTADO SOCIAL MUITO INTERNACIONALISTA E GENEROSO.DISTRIBUIU MUITAS DISCRIMINAÇÕES POSITIVAS POR CONTA DO INDIGENATO QUE TEM QUE PAGAR
Estudantes estrangeiros em Portugal aumentaram 74% nos últimos cinco anos
São cerca de 34 mil os alunos de 200 nacionalidades que estudam em Portugal. O país é considerado um dos destinos favoritos para estudar.
PODIAM INFORMAR DOS "DESCONTOS" NAS PROPINAS.OU ATÉ NA SUA AUSÊNCIA...MAS ISSO CLARO É QUE É SEGREDO DE ESTADO...
São cerca de 34 mil os alunos de 200 nacionalidades que estudam em Portugal. O país é considerado um dos destinos favoritos para estudar.
PODIAM INFORMAR DOS "DESCONTOS" NAS PROPINAS.OU ATÉ NA SUA AUSÊNCIA...MAS ISSO CLARO É QUE É SEGREDO DE ESTADO...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)