Saturday, April 19, 2008

A IMIGRAÇÃO NÃO É BENÉFICA PARA A ECONOMIA

From The TimesApril 1, 2008

Immigration is not a benefit to the economy and should be cut, say peersRichard Ford, Home Correspondent
Immigration should be capped, according to a parliamentary report published today which concludes that record numbers of new immigrants have had “little or no impact” on economic well being.

Some groups, including the low-paid, young people seeking jobs and some ethnic minorities, may have suffered because of competition for work from immigrants willing to accept low wages and poor working conditions.

Today’s report, from the Lords Economic Affairs Committee, whose members include two former Conservative Chancellors of the Exchequer, seeks to undermine the Government’s claim that record levels of immigration have boosted the economy.

It also sets out to demolish a range of arguments in favour of immigration, including the one that foreigners are needed to prevent labour shortages and also to help to support an increasingly ageing population.

Related Links
Fears for Scots economy as Poles head home
Smith hails points-based immigration system
The report endorses the Conservative policy of capping immigration by urging ministers to set an “explicit target range” for numbers entering the country. Controversially, it also raises the prospect of cutting the number of partners and other family members allowed to settle in Britain because a relative is already here.

And it suggests that, if the predicted 190,000-a-year net migration rate continues, house prices would be 10 per cent higher in 2028 than they would have been if there was zero net immigration.

Lord Wakeham, the former Conservative Cabinet minister who chaired the Lords inquiry, said: “The argument put forward by the Government that large-scale net immigration brings significant economic benefits for the UK is unconvincing. We have found no evidence to support their position.”

The Government has said that immigrants are boosting the overall economy by £6 billion a year, but the committee said that this was a misleading measure and a better one would be the impact on income per head of the resident population. “On this measure, immigration has had a largely neutral effect on economic wellbeing, with the income of some groups of low-paid workers actually falling,” it said.

It added that the available evidence suggested immigration had had a small negative impact on the lowest-paid workers and a small positive impact on the earnings of hgher-paid workers. “Resident workers whose wages have been adversely affected by immigrations are likely to include a significant proportion of previous immigrants and workers from ethnic minority groups,” the report added.

Lord Layard, an economist and Labour member of the committee, gave warning that Britain would face significant pressure from immigration for years. “We will have a permanent pressure of people to move in our direction. Britain has an extra resource, the English language, for attracting people here. There is no doubt whatever that the pressure will remain for half a century or more,” he said.

The findings of the 82-page report were seized on by the Conservatives and Migrationwatch, the organisation that campaigns against mass immigration. David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, said: “This cross-party committee of distinguished peers has demolished the Government’s case on several fronts. They show unequivocally that the benefits of the current immigration policy to ordinary UK citizens are largely non-existent.”

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch, said that the report was a watershed. “A heavyweight committee of Parliament has torn to shreds the Government’s economic case for the massive levels of immigration which they have actively encouraged.

“Having lost their smokescreen of dodgy economic arguments, they now have no alternative but to implement a sharp reduction in numbers. The public will accept nothing less.”

But Neil Carberry, head of employment at the CBI, said: “In the global economy, businesses need a flexible immigration system that allows them to source the skills they need when appropriate UK-born staff cannot be found.”

He said that businesses were daily filling jobs which, without migration, would have been left empty.

Liam Byrne, the Immigration Minister, welcomed the report and insisted it proved that the Government was right to ask the independent Migration Advisory Committee to tell ministers which workers the new Australian-style points system should keep out or let in. He added: “What’s more, our plan for earned citizenship will mean that only those who can speak English, pay taxes and obey Parliament’s law will be able to earn the right to stay.”

The Lords committee comprised five Labour and five Conservative peers, including Lord Lamont of Lerwick and Lord Lawson of Blaby, both former Tory Chancellors, two Liberal Democrats and four crossbenchers.

ISTO NO REINO DE SUA MAJESTADE QUE É UM PAÍS DO PRIMEIRO MUNDO.ENTÃO NESTE JÁ ARREMEDO DE PAÍS A CAMINHO DE ÁFRICA O QUE DIRIAM OS SENHORES.É QUE AQUI O PESSOAL CHEGA PARA PARTICIPAR NA "DISTRIBUIÇÃO" POIS QUE "PRODUÇÃO" É COISA QUE NÃO EXISTE.ESTA POLÍTICA DE MAGNANIMIDADE SAI CARA NÃO SÓ AOS POBRES QUE RECEBEM MUITO MENOS, COMO E PRINCIPALMENTE AOS POUCOS QUE TÊM QUE SUPORTAR COM OS SEUS IMPOSTOS ESTA MÁ GOVERNAÇÃO TIPO BOKASSA.ISTO É EU QUERO, POSSO E MANDO E QUEM REFILAR É XENÓFOBO, RACISTA E DE EXTREMA DIREITA.
MAS QUE OS HUMANISTAS EM 34 ANOS "DESFIZERAM" MAIS O PAÍS DO QUE NOS 8 SÉCULOS ANTERIORES LÁ ISSO NÃO PODEM NEGAR...

O NOVO COLONIALISMO É MUITO MELHOR...

Remember that America was on the other side in this conflict, fanning the flames of African nationalism and undermining the European powers. Yet Belgium - Belgium - managed to hold on to a colony 76 times its size, the Congo, from 1908 (after its rapine private ownership by King Leopold II) until 1960. Contrary to widespread belief, Britain was never beaten by the Mau Mau in Kenya, and in most of the African colonies and protectorates relinquished between 1957 (Ghana) and 1968 (Swaziland) we had been meeting little if any armed resistance. Britain was not drummed but shouted out of Africa.

Portugal, meanwhile, hung on to two territories (now Angola and Mozambique) the first twice the size of Texas, the second twice the size of California, until 1975. For years an impoverished and virtually Third World European tinpot dictatorship sustained two wars simultaneously against nationalist insurgencies in both countries without going under. Meanwhile. a tiny force of white renegades denied victory to Mugabe's Patriotic Front for nearly eight years until 1980: yet there were 20 times as many blacks as whites in Rhodesia, and the breakaway regime of Ian Smith was under international economic siege throughout.

Why then did the great (and lesser) powers of the day turn their backs on empire in Africa in the 20th century, and why in the 21st might their successors return to an interest in acquiring political grip?

European imperial powers lost the will rather than the capacity to own and govern overseas resources. A world in which all could buy and sell on the global market was arriving. It is a world, however, which is now feeling the pinch in the natural resources with which Africa is richly endowed. Meanwhile, the continent is in many places run by outfits that resemble gangs rather than governments. At their most dysfunctional (as in Congo) this disintegration seriously impedes the extraction of resources, because security, communications and infrastructure break down.

But a solution beckons: buy your own gang. You hardly need visit and are certainly not required to administer the gang's territory. You simply give it support, munitions, bribes and protection to keep the roads and airports open; and it pays you with access to resources. You dress up the arrangement as helping Africans to help themselves. The French, who have been doing this in their former African possessions for years, lead the way. But it is when China, then America, and perhaps even Russia or India follow, that the scramble for Africa will truly be resumed.

NÓS POR CÁ FICAMOS SÓ COM AS DESPESAS... E SOMOS COLONIZADOS!

LIÇÃO SINDICAL. POR CÁ TUDO A FAVOR DA CHINA

A Chinese ship carrying arms destined for Zimbabwe was last night forced to turn back after South African unions refused to unload it, claiming that to do so would be “grossly irresponsible”, South African media reported.

The reversal is a humiliation for President Mbeki, who had said that the Government was powerless to stop the shipment of three million rounds of AK47 ammunition, 1,500 rocket-propelled grenades and more than 3,000 mortar rounds and mortar tubes to President Mugabe’s armed forces.

ALTO AÍ E PARA O BAILE

Sweden is so upset by other EU countries that it has vowed to push for a fair distribution of asylum-seekers.

“We have reached the conclusion that there should be a common European asylum system and we will make this a priority during our presidency of the EU in 2009,” Mr Billström said.

QUEM É QUE SEMPRE ANDOU NA FRENTE A FACILITAR A DESCOLONIZAÇÃO E BOTAR ABAIXO DE ADMINISTARÇÕES DITAS"COLONIAIS"?
ACHO PORTANTO MUITO BEM QUE PAGUEM O RESULTADO DAS ACÇÕES "ANTI-COLONIALISTAS" RECEBENDO EM CASA O RESULTADO...

SEMPRE A ENRIQUECER

PJ prende quatro suspeitos
Carros de luxo furtados para África
A Polícia Judiciária anunciou ontem a prisão de quatro homens, membros de uma rede transnacional que se dedicava ao furto e viciação de automóveis. O território nacional era usado pelo grupo como plataforma de envio de veículos roubados para África e ainda como terreno para o furto de veículos comerciais.




Os detidos (um despachante, um médico, um mecânico e um pedreiro) têm idades compreendidas entre os 28 e os 46 anos. Em comunicado, a PJ não especificou as respectivas nacionalidades.

Ó PACHECO ERA O MEDINHO PÁ...

O que é que movia quem se recusava a fazer a guerra colonial?

OS COMUNISTAS IAM COMO SUBMARINOS DO SISTEMA PARA MELHOR DAREM INFORMAÇÃO AOS SEUS FILHOS ANTI-COLONIALISTAS E SABOTAREM O ESFORÇO DE GUERRA POR DENTRO.
DO RESTANTE PESSOAL QUE FUGIA Á GUERRA, PARA GARANTIR A SOBREVIVÊNCIA DA ESPÉCIE(A SUA) HAVIA DOIS NÍVEIS:
OS MUITO COBARDES QUE DESERTAVAM ANTES E DURANTE O SEU SMO MAS ANTES DA MOBILIZAÇÃO PARA O ULTRAMAR
OS QUE SÓ DESERTAVAM DEPOIS DE SABEREM PARA ONDE ERAM MOBILIZADOS

TANTO ERA ASSIM QUE NOS ÚLTIMOS TEMPOS EM QUE O NÚMERO DE DESERTORES ERA DE QUASE 100000 O PESSOAL SÓ PASSOU A SABER PARA ONDE IA ,A BORDO...

NOS DIAS DE HOJE EM QUE UMA BOA PERCENTAGEM DESSA RAPAZIADA AINDA ANDA EM FUNÇÕES DE MANDO CÁ NO BURGO NÃO ADMIRA AO ESTADO A QUE TENHAM CONDUZIDO PORTUGAL.DE PAPEL HIGIÉNICO SEMPRE NA MÃO PARA LIMPAR OS RABINHOS QUE LHES MANDAREM...OU O SEU PARA OUTROS SE SERVIREM QUE NISSO NÃO SÃO ESQUISITOS...
CLARO QUE OUTROS SE LIMITARAM A VANDALIZAR RELÓGIOS NA CALADA DA NOITE , APÓS UNS COPOS PARA GANHAR CORAGEM, MAS COM GRANDE SENTIDO POSTERIOR DE "RESISTÊNCIA"...

Friday, April 18, 2008

MÁS POLÍTICAS DÃO MAUS RESULTADOS.TEMOS PORTANTO POLÍTICOS QUE NÃO NOS SERVEM

Lisboa - Detenções

No dia 16 de Abril de 2008 , o Comando Metropolitano da PSP de Lisboa procedeu à detenção em flagrante delito de 6 indivíduos estrangeiros por furto no interior de um estabelecimento, após elementos da investigação criminal em actividade de prevenção criminal acharem suspeita a sua movimentação e atitudes à saída de uma casa devoluta, a partir da qual iniciaram vigilância discreta.

Para consumar este crime, os detidos entraram no já citado prédio devoluto, contíguo ao da loja, procederam à destruição da parede do estabelecimento, com utilização de berbequins, fazendo um pequeno buraco que lhes permitiu o acesso ao interior do estabelecimento. Já no interior apoderaram-se de roupa e calçado que após embalarem em sacos de grandes dimensões, começaram a transportar para uma viatura que seria utilizada para a fuga.

Aquando da intercepção dos 6 suspeitos, com idades compreendidas entre 23 e 39 anos de idade, que actuavam em conjugação de esforços, foi possível apreender diversos objectos subtraídos do interior do estabelecimento, no valor de cerca de 63.000,00 Euros dos quais se destacam 81 pares de sapatos, 48 T-shirts, 170 gravatas, 101 camisas, 80 botões de punho, 22 fatos, 12 calças, 17 cintos, 13 pijamas, 2 lenços e um plastron, bem como de todo o material utilizado na realização do assalto.

Dado a transregionalidade da actividade deste grupo, foram encetados contactos com várias Esquadras de Investigação Criminal da PSP do país, bem como com o Núcleo de Investigação Criminal da GNR de Coruche, para diversas diligências no âmbito dos respectivos processos que confirmaram as diversas suspeitas, que desde logo se prontificaram a colaborar. O DIAP de Lisboa acompanhou as diligências efectuadas pela Divisão de Investigação Criminal do Comando de forma presencial.

BONITO CPP, LEI DA LEGALIZAÇÃO , DA NACIONALIDADE E DA DROGA CHEGAM PARA AFUNDAR ISTO SE NÃO COLOCASSEM A CEREJA EM CIMA DO BOLO AO NOMEAR COMISSÁRIOS POLÍTICOS PARA OS GRUPOS ECONÓMICOS... O DESASTRE COMPLETO!