https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1875450/horrific-moment-boy-6-is-shot-dead-by-police-in-self-defence-is-shown-in-trial-of-two-officers-accused-of-murder/
KID KILLED BY COPS Horrific moment boy, 6, is shot dead by police ‘in self-defence’ is shown in trial of two officers accused of murder
A judge released a graphic video of the scene of the shooting that resulted in the death of little Jeremy Mardis
VIDEO
BY MARYSE GODDEN 29th September 2016, 9:34 am
THIS is the horrific moment two cops fired shots at a car killing a six-year-old boy.
A graphic video released by a judge shows the dramatic scene of the shooting that resulted in the death of little Jeremy Mardis in Marksville, Louisiana, US, last year.
Body cam footage shows cops shooting into a car and killing a 6-year-old boy sitting in the passenger seat MARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
Body cam footage shows cops shooting into a car and killing a 6-year-old boy sitting in the passenger seat
Footage shows the shooting which only lasts for seconds followed by 13 minutes of the heart-breaking aftermath as the officer with the body camera checks on the lifeless body of the little boy in the passenger seat as his dad, Christopher Few, lies bleeding out on the floor.
The shooting took place November 3, 2015 after marshals Derrick Stafford and Norris Greenhouse Jr. claimed they tried to pull Few over for an outstanding warrant.
Prosecutors say that one of the officers, Derrick Stafford, had a pattern of hurting people he’s arresting – including last November’s fatal shooting, in which he shot at Few while his hands were raised.
The shooting took place in Marksville, Louisiana last year MARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
The shooting took place in Marksville, Louisiana last year
Marksville police shooting that killed 6-year-old autistic Jeremy Mardis released
Victim: six-year-old Jeremy Mardis was killed in the shooting FACEBOOK
5
Victim: Six-year-old Jeremy Mardis was killed in the shooting
Defence attorneys claim the boys father Christopher Few pictured drove recklessly during a two-mile police chase FACEBOOK
5
Defence attorneys claim the boys father Christopher Few pictured drove recklessly during a two-mile police chase
Matthew Derbes, a prosecutor from Attorney General Jeff Landry's office, said: "Motive is something the jury wants to hear. Why would they do this?"
But defence attorneys for Stafford and Norris Greenhouse Jr. argue that the officers acted in self-defence.
They claim Few drove recklessly during a two-mile police chase in which ended up in a collision between the two vehicles which triggered the shooting
RELATED STORIES
GUN RAMPAGE Paris supermarket shooting leaves two critical before gunman hands himself in after police surround his flat
‘GONNA KILL THAT MOTHERF******!’ Terrifying dashcam footage shows white US cop chasing and then shooting dead black driver with rifle
UNARMED AND SHOT DEAD Cop charged with manslaughter after unarmed black motorist shot dead
'HE ABSOLUTELY HAD A GUN' Police release bodycam footage of Keith Scott shooting after protests following his death in Charlotte
MILWAUKEE MADNESS Police shooting victim whose death sparked riots is named as cops say officer who killed him was black
One of Stafford's attorneys, Christopher LaCour said: "Christopher Few was a suspect before they knew that child was in the car."
While the video doesn't capture the entire incident, District Court Judge William Bennett noted the graphic footage showed no evidence that the cops were in fear for their lives.
Officers Derrick Stafford, left, and Norris Greenhouse Jr, right on second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder charges
5
Officers Derrick Stafford, left, and Norris Greenhouse Jr, right on second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder charges
“I never saw a kid in the car, man,” Stafford tells Greenhouse according to the Associated Press, which has not published that part of the video yet.
“I never saw a kid, bro."
But ballistics indicate he fired his gun 14 times, striking the child at least three times.
Greenhouse fired four times, but they have not determined if his bullets struck anybody.
The footage is from a body cam worn by a third cop, Marksville Police Sgt. Kenneth Parnell, III, who did not fire his gun.
The head of the Louisiana State Police said the bodycam footage was the most disturbing thing he's ever seen.
Stafford and Greenhouse Jr both face second-degree murder and second-degree attempted murder charges.
PERTENCE CERTAMENTE AO submundo da blogosfera DE ACORDO COM CIENTÍFICAS CLASSIFICAÇÕES DUNS GAJOS QUE VIVEM DOS MEUS IMPOSTOS E ANDAM A AFUNDAR PORTUGAL
Thursday, September 29, 2016
NO MORE HP
Has Big Brother taken over YOUR printer...and secretly made sure it can only use ink more expensive than champagne?
By GUY WALTERS FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 00:56 GMT, 29 September 2016 | UPDATED: 00:57 GMT, 29 September 2016
On Tuesday two weeks ago, in homes and offices all over the world, something very strange started to happen. Without any warning, tens of thousands of printers suddenly stopped working.
Bewildering error messages appeared that stated that there was a 'cartridge problem', or an 'older generation cartridge' was present, or more puzzling still, that 'one or more cartridges are missing or damaged'.
Users were perplexed, and more than a little frustrated. The cartridges in their printers were neither missing, nor damaged, nor indeed old (although they were, of course, expensive), and yet still the troublesome error messages popped up.
Computer giant HP is facing a backlash after blocking customers from using cheaper ink cartridges in its printers (pictured, stock image)
+2
Computer giant HP is facing a backlash after blocking customers from using cheaper ink cartridges in its printers (pictured, stock image)
So what had happened? Within a few hours, it quickly became clear that the source of the mystery lay in the fact that all the printers were manufactured by the same company — Hewlett-Packard, or HP. More specifically, the models in question all came from the OfficeJet, OfficeJet Pro and OfficeJet Pro X ranges, which cost anywhere between £70 and several hundred pounds.
Unbeknown to the thousands of unsuspecting users around the world, HP had secretly installed the technological equivalent of a time-bomb in their
The company is unapologetic about such a move, which it brazenly calls an 'update'. Its aim, a spokesperson said, was 'to protect HP's innovations and intellectual property'.
What HP has done is the equivalent of a car manufacturer such as Vauxhall ensuring that its cars can only run on petrol manufactured by Vauxhall. Such a move would, of course, provoke a huge outcry, and might even be against the law.
But so far, apart from some grumbles on social media, there has been no collective expression of outrage that a computer giant is effectively remotely disabling products that customers have bought in good faith, and then forcing those same customers to buy its own branded products that are more expensive.
Why have we taken this lying down? How are the likes of HP able secretly to access our printers? And what can we do to stop them?
There's no doubt that most of us loathe printers. A necessary evil, we are all too accustomed to their unreliability, the shocking cost of their ink, and their mysterious capacity to stop communicating with our computers, just when we're in a hurry to get a document printed.
And yet most of us need them, as there are times we still want to read something on a piece of old-fashioned A4 paper rather than on an iPad or some other screen.
All of us know that using printers is an expensive business, that firms sell the printers at a loss, then slap horrifically huge margins onto their ink cartridges — which is where the likes of HP really coin it in.
Take, for example, HP's 4520 All-in-One Printer, which can be bought on Amazon for the 'bargain' price of £49.99, which ensures it sells by the lorry-load.
With this model, HP will charge you a whopping £38.21 to buy a package of one black cartridge and one tri-colour cartridge. This means these two measly cartridges — which with normal family usage will run out in a matter of weeks or months — cost more than 75 per cent of the value of the entire printer.
HP are not the only offenders, of course. Buy two Canon cartridges — one black, one colour — in the larger, wider cartridge size which is supposed to be more economical, and it'll set you back a staggering £56.
It's a long-running joke that it's almost cheaper to buy a whole new printer (which comes with ink supplied) rather than a new set of cartridges.
For the fact is that printer ink is far more expensive by volume than Dom Perignon champagne or even Chanel No 5 perfume. It is precisely because printer manufacturers charge a tech billionaire's ransom for their cartridges that many of us buy cheaper versions which are copies of the brand-name cartridges.
They are typically made in China and sold by online retailers in the UK. Although some of these cartridges can be inferior to those made by the printer manufacturers, many are just as good. And the savings can be huge.
To replace the six cartridges on, say, a Canon Pixma MP990 costs £75.46 if you buy the Canon-branded cartridges.
However, if you purchase a full set of so-called 'after-market cartridges' from a firm such as Inkmasters then they're just £22.98 — less than a third of the Canon price. Clearly, only the lazy or naive spend the extra £52.48 on an almost identical product. This is why firms such as HP and Canon are unhappy when people buy other manufacturers' cartridges, because their business model would collapse if we all did it.
Therefore, in order to protect their business, manufacturers have gone to war on both consumers and the sellers of after-market cartridges.
Dennis Haines, 67, the managing director of Inkmasters, which turns over £6 million every year, explains the challenge faced by companies such as his.
'First, the big firms sue rival suppliers for infringing their patents. Clearly, they have deep pockets, whereas the likes of us who are far smaller find it very hard to afford to defend ourselves.
'Furthermore, the lawsuits can drag on for years, and to the best of my knowledge, not one of these suits brought in Europe has ever been resolved in court.'
The second way in which printer giants can make life difficult is to protect their businesses by installing small computer chips on their cartridges. The first company to do this was Epson, claiming its aim was to 'improve the user experience'.
However, the real reason lay in the bottom line. If the printer detected that the cartridge did not have the right kind of chip, it would not work.
This meant that manufacturers of cheaper ink not only had to copy the cartridges, but also the chips they contained if their product was to work.
For a while, they managed to do this, and an uneasy truce existed between the printer firms and the cheaper producers. But HP's recent move is clearly a new salvo.
So how exactly has HP managed to cripple so many of their customers' printers?
The answer is that printers 'update' themselves automatically via their connection to the internet, which is either directly through wi-fi or via your computer. When installing our printers' set-up software on our computers, many of us tick an 'automatic update' box, thinking little of it.
But according to Mr Haines, it's within that automatic updating that the trouble lies.
'What I suspect has happened is that the users of these HP printers, when they first installed their printer 'driver' software onto their computers, ticked a box that allowed for automatic updates,' he says.
The update to the printers' systems was delivered in March this year, but there seems to have been a built-in delay which meant HP printers would only stop accepting after-market cartridges on September 13.
'This is a very aggressive move,' says Mr Haines. 'But then again, HP, like all firms, has every right to protect its intellectual property. On the other hand, what they also have is a responsibility of fully informing their customers of what an update entails.'
The problem is that many firms are extremely opaque when it comes to telling customers an update will actually make life harder — and more expensive. The devil is often buried in the lengthy and verbose details at the end user's licence agreement, if indeed it is written there at all.
So what can printer users do to outwit the tech giants?
Mr Haines advises HP users to wait for firms like his to produce new after-market cartridges that will cope with the update, but this will involve a wait of a few months. 'It's an irritant,' he says, 'but we do try to keep on top of such things.'
Another option is to try refilling your cartridges yourself, but this is a tricky and messy business. And besides, the chip in the cartridge will, in all likelihood, refuse to acknowledge that the cartridge is once again full.
Mr Haines also suggests buying an old, second-hand printer, for which the manufacturers will no longer be bothering to update the software. 'All 80 printers in our office are more than five years old and built to last,' he reveals, 'and the company that appears to be the least sneaky with its updates is Brother.
'So look for a reliable Brother printer more than five years old and you should have no problem getting good quality, cheap cartridges.'
The final option is to give up printers altogether. As it happens, it is estimated that printer sales are declining by 5 per cent each year, as more of us read documents on tablets and smartphones.
But then again, as anyone who has ever worked in a supposedly paperless office fully knows, eschewing paper ultimately seems frankly impossible.
So for now it looks as if the battle between the likes of HP and consumers is set to continue. We really are stuck in the ultimate paper jam.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3812857/Has-Big-Brother-taken-printer-secretly-sure-use-ink-expensive-champagne.html#ixzz4LdN99rTQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
HOJE EM DIA SÓ FALTA AOS GOVERNOS OBRIGAREM OS INDÍGENAS A TEREM FILHOS ADOPTADOS NO PLANETA...PARA FAZER AVANÇAR A RAÇA MISTA CLARO...
PS
A MICROSOFT TAMBÉM ABUSA CÁ EM CASA A PARTIR DA CASA DELES.PUTA QUE OS PARIU PORQUE O COMPUTADOR É MEU E NÃO DELES
By GUY WALTERS FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 00:56 GMT, 29 September 2016 | UPDATED: 00:57 GMT, 29 September 2016
On Tuesday two weeks ago, in homes and offices all over the world, something very strange started to happen. Without any warning, tens of thousands of printers suddenly stopped working.
Bewildering error messages appeared that stated that there was a 'cartridge problem', or an 'older generation cartridge' was present, or more puzzling still, that 'one or more cartridges are missing or damaged'.
Users were perplexed, and more than a little frustrated. The cartridges in their printers were neither missing, nor damaged, nor indeed old (although they were, of course, expensive), and yet still the troublesome error messages popped up.
Computer giant HP is facing a backlash after blocking customers from using cheaper ink cartridges in its printers (pictured, stock image)
+2
Computer giant HP is facing a backlash after blocking customers from using cheaper ink cartridges in its printers (pictured, stock image)
So what had happened? Within a few hours, it quickly became clear that the source of the mystery lay in the fact that all the printers were manufactured by the same company — Hewlett-Packard, or HP. More specifically, the models in question all came from the OfficeJet, OfficeJet Pro and OfficeJet Pro X ranges, which cost anywhere between £70 and several hundred pounds.
Unbeknown to the thousands of unsuspecting users around the world, HP had secretly installed the technological equivalent of a time-bomb in their
The company is unapologetic about such a move, which it brazenly calls an 'update'. Its aim, a spokesperson said, was 'to protect HP's innovations and intellectual property'.
What HP has done is the equivalent of a car manufacturer such as Vauxhall ensuring that its cars can only run on petrol manufactured by Vauxhall. Such a move would, of course, provoke a huge outcry, and might even be against the law.
But so far, apart from some grumbles on social media, there has been no collective expression of outrage that a computer giant is effectively remotely disabling products that customers have bought in good faith, and then forcing those same customers to buy its own branded products that are more expensive.
Why have we taken this lying down? How are the likes of HP able secretly to access our printers? And what can we do to stop them?
There's no doubt that most of us loathe printers. A necessary evil, we are all too accustomed to their unreliability, the shocking cost of their ink, and their mysterious capacity to stop communicating with our computers, just when we're in a hurry to get a document printed.
And yet most of us need them, as there are times we still want to read something on a piece of old-fashioned A4 paper rather than on an iPad or some other screen.
All of us know that using printers is an expensive business, that firms sell the printers at a loss, then slap horrifically huge margins onto their ink cartridges — which is where the likes of HP really coin it in.
Take, for example, HP's 4520 All-in-One Printer, which can be bought on Amazon for the 'bargain' price of £49.99, which ensures it sells by the lorry-load.
With this model, HP will charge you a whopping £38.21 to buy a package of one black cartridge and one tri-colour cartridge. This means these two measly cartridges — which with normal family usage will run out in a matter of weeks or months — cost more than 75 per cent of the value of the entire printer.
HP are not the only offenders, of course. Buy two Canon cartridges — one black, one colour — in the larger, wider cartridge size which is supposed to be more economical, and it'll set you back a staggering £56.
It's a long-running joke that it's almost cheaper to buy a whole new printer (which comes with ink supplied) rather than a new set of cartridges.
For the fact is that printer ink is far more expensive by volume than Dom Perignon champagne or even Chanel No 5 perfume. It is precisely because printer manufacturers charge a tech billionaire's ransom for their cartridges that many of us buy cheaper versions which are copies of the brand-name cartridges.
They are typically made in China and sold by online retailers in the UK. Although some of these cartridges can be inferior to those made by the printer manufacturers, many are just as good. And the savings can be huge.
To replace the six cartridges on, say, a Canon Pixma MP990 costs £75.46 if you buy the Canon-branded cartridges.
However, if you purchase a full set of so-called 'after-market cartridges' from a firm such as Inkmasters then they're just £22.98 — less than a third of the Canon price. Clearly, only the lazy or naive spend the extra £52.48 on an almost identical product. This is why firms such as HP and Canon are unhappy when people buy other manufacturers' cartridges, because their business model would collapse if we all did it.
Therefore, in order to protect their business, manufacturers have gone to war on both consumers and the sellers of after-market cartridges.
Dennis Haines, 67, the managing director of Inkmasters, which turns over £6 million every year, explains the challenge faced by companies such as his.
'First, the big firms sue rival suppliers for infringing their patents. Clearly, they have deep pockets, whereas the likes of us who are far smaller find it very hard to afford to defend ourselves.
'Furthermore, the lawsuits can drag on for years, and to the best of my knowledge, not one of these suits brought in Europe has ever been resolved in court.'
The second way in which printer giants can make life difficult is to protect their businesses by installing small computer chips on their cartridges. The first company to do this was Epson, claiming its aim was to 'improve the user experience'.
However, the real reason lay in the bottom line. If the printer detected that the cartridge did not have the right kind of chip, it would not work.
This meant that manufacturers of cheaper ink not only had to copy the cartridges, but also the chips they contained if their product was to work.
For a while, they managed to do this, and an uneasy truce existed between the printer firms and the cheaper producers. But HP's recent move is clearly a new salvo.
So how exactly has HP managed to cripple so many of their customers' printers?
The answer is that printers 'update' themselves automatically via their connection to the internet, which is either directly through wi-fi or via your computer. When installing our printers' set-up software on our computers, many of us tick an 'automatic update' box, thinking little of it.
But according to Mr Haines, it's within that automatic updating that the trouble lies.
'What I suspect has happened is that the users of these HP printers, when they first installed their printer 'driver' software onto their computers, ticked a box that allowed for automatic updates,' he says.
The update to the printers' systems was delivered in March this year, but there seems to have been a built-in delay which meant HP printers would only stop accepting after-market cartridges on September 13.
'This is a very aggressive move,' says Mr Haines. 'But then again, HP, like all firms, has every right to protect its intellectual property. On the other hand, what they also have is a responsibility of fully informing their customers of what an update entails.'
The problem is that many firms are extremely opaque when it comes to telling customers an update will actually make life harder — and more expensive. The devil is often buried in the lengthy and verbose details at the end user's licence agreement, if indeed it is written there at all.
So what can printer users do to outwit the tech giants?
Mr Haines advises HP users to wait for firms like his to produce new after-market cartridges that will cope with the update, but this will involve a wait of a few months. 'It's an irritant,' he says, 'but we do try to keep on top of such things.'
Another option is to try refilling your cartridges yourself, but this is a tricky and messy business. And besides, the chip in the cartridge will, in all likelihood, refuse to acknowledge that the cartridge is once again full.
Mr Haines also suggests buying an old, second-hand printer, for which the manufacturers will no longer be bothering to update the software. 'All 80 printers in our office are more than five years old and built to last,' he reveals, 'and the company that appears to be the least sneaky with its updates is Brother.
'So look for a reliable Brother printer more than five years old and you should have no problem getting good quality, cheap cartridges.'
The final option is to give up printers altogether. As it happens, it is estimated that printer sales are declining by 5 per cent each year, as more of us read documents on tablets and smartphones.
But then again, as anyone who has ever worked in a supposedly paperless office fully knows, eschewing paper ultimately seems frankly impossible.
So for now it looks as if the battle between the likes of HP and consumers is set to continue. We really are stuck in the ultimate paper jam.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3812857/Has-Big-Brother-taken-printer-secretly-sure-use-ink-expensive-champagne.html#ixzz4LdN99rTQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
HOJE EM DIA SÓ FALTA AOS GOVERNOS OBRIGAREM OS INDÍGENAS A TEREM FILHOS ADOPTADOS NO PLANETA...PARA FAZER AVANÇAR A RAÇA MISTA CLARO...
PS
A MICROSOFT TAMBÉM ABUSA CÁ EM CASA A PARTIR DA CASA DELES.PUTA QUE OS PARIU PORQUE O COMPUTADOR É MEU E NÃO DELES
CHAMEM-ME O QUE QUISEREM PORQUE SOU DA MAÇONARIA
http://leitor.expresso.pt/#library/expressodiario/28-09-2016/caderno-1/ultima/henrique-monteiro--amanha
OS MILAGRES NO SOBADO DE LISBOA ACONTECEM TODOS OS DIAS.SOB A BATUTA DOS INTERNACIONALISTAS EM QUE A MAÇONARIA ESTÁ SEMPRE PRESENTE.DEPOIS É AQUELA COISA "O DINHEIRO APARECE SEMPRE" DESDE QUE O PLANETA SEJA SALVO.E A EITO QUE NÃO PODE FICAR NINGUÉM PARA TRÁS.UM PAI ISLÂMICO COM DUAS FAMÍLIAS NUMEROSAS COITADINHOS DELES QUE SÓ QUEREM O NOSSO BEM DEPOIS DE LÁ NA CASA DELES TEREM EXPULSO E SEM BENS TODOS OS BRANCOS...QUE AGORA SÓ TÊM QUE PAGAR TODOS ESTES LUXOS DOS "DIREITOS HUMANOS" UNILATERAIS...
OS MILAGRES NO SOBADO DE LISBOA ACONTECEM TODOS OS DIAS.SOB A BATUTA DOS INTERNACIONALISTAS EM QUE A MAÇONARIA ESTÁ SEMPRE PRESENTE.DEPOIS É AQUELA COISA "O DINHEIRO APARECE SEMPRE" DESDE QUE O PLANETA SEJA SALVO.E A EITO QUE NÃO PODE FICAR NINGUÉM PARA TRÁS.UM PAI ISLÂMICO COM DUAS FAMÍLIAS NUMEROSAS COITADINHOS DELES QUE SÓ QUEREM O NOSSO BEM DEPOIS DE LÁ NA CASA DELES TEREM EXPULSO E SEM BENS TODOS OS BRANCOS...QUE AGORA SÓ TÊM QUE PAGAR TODOS ESTES LUXOS DOS "DIREITOS HUMANOS" UNILATERAIS...
OS SUECOS COM TANTOS "SUECOS" E AINDA POR CIMA ISLÂMICOS VÃO TER PROBLEMAS
Suécia vai restabelecer serviço militar obrigatório
CLARO QUE PODEM SEMPRE ADOPTAR O ESTILO CHINÊS DE UM PAÍS DOIS SISTEMAS...
CLARO QUE PODEM SEMPRE ADOPTAR O ESTILO CHINÊS DE UM PAÍS DOIS SISTEMAS...
Ó CÂNCIO DESINIBIDA COMO ÉS LANÇA A PETIÇÃO PARA ELEVAR O CU PORTUGUÊS A PATRIMÓNIO DA HUMANIDADE...
Calceteiro lança petição para elevar calçada portuguesa a património mundial
O N! LARGOS DAS BICHAS AGRADECEM POIS ESTÃO SEMPRE AO SERVIÇO DA HUMANIDADE EM ESPECIAL DE AFRICANOS QUE TÊM A FAMA DE GRANDES CARALHOS...
O N! LARGOS DAS BICHAS AGRADECEM POIS ESTÃO SEMPRE AO SERVIÇO DA HUMANIDADE EM ESPECIAL DE AFRICANOS QUE TÊM A FAMA DE GRANDES CARALHOS...
Ó VAN DUNEM COM AS ESCOLAS DAS GRANDES CIDADES A TEREM MAIS DE 50% DE DIFERENTES É PRECISO COLONIZAR O INTERIOR.AQUILO ANDA CHEIO DE ASSIMETRIAS...
Van Dunem: Alterações ao mapa judiciário visam alterar "caminho das assimetrias"
E SE HOUVER BRANCO A QUEIXAR-SE DE SER ÚNICO LÁ NA TURMA DELE QUE LHE SEJA DITO PARA IR PARA A SUA TERRINHA...
E SE HOUVER BRANCO A QUEIXAR-SE DE SER ÚNICO LÁ NA TURMA DELE QUE LHE SEJA DITO PARA IR PARA A SUA TERRINHA...
OS NOSSOS INTERNACIONALISTAS ANDAM A DESCURAR A EXPOSIÇÃO AOS ESQUIMÓS...
Chineses entram no BCP com desconto de 10%
Fosun entra no BCP com desconto de 10%A administração do BCP já mandatou Nuno Amado para "finalizar com exclusividade as negociações com a Fosun".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Imobiliário na China é a "maior bolha da História"
OLHEM QUE AÍ ESTÁ O FUTURO COM O AQUECIMENTO GLOBAL...
PS
QUE NÃO LHES FALTEM AS NECESSÁRIAS LINHAS DE COCA MOTIVADORAS E O HABITUAL PUTEDO...
Fosun entra no BCP com desconto de 10%A administração do BCP já mandatou Nuno Amado para "finalizar com exclusividade as negociações com a Fosun".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Imobiliário na China é a "maior bolha da História"
OLHEM QUE AÍ ESTÁ O FUTURO COM O AQUECIMENTO GLOBAL...
PS
QUE NÃO LHES FALTEM AS NECESSÁRIAS LINHAS DE COCA MOTIVADORAS E O HABITUAL PUTEDO...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)